Unique garden experiment changes understanding of behavioural mechanisms
Issued by University of Leicester Press Office on 4 April 2012
A unique experiment carried out in a Leicester garden, and concurrently in a garden in Italy, has yielded surprising results that has changed scientific knowledge and is published in one of the world’s foremost science journals.
Research into the behaviour of flies and their sleep-wake mechanism – their 24-hour behavioural rhythms- was conducted by researchers from the Universities of Leicester and Padova. Their findings flew in the face of over 40 years’ research in controlled laboratory conditions about the behaviour of these insects.
The study of fly rhythms is important because the same 24-hour clock is found in almost all organisms, including some bacteria, but the genetic basis of it is practically the same among insects and humans so has important implications for the study of many health problems which have a rhythmic component. These include sleep disorders, the impact of shift work schedules on the body, jetlag, even obesity and cardiovascular disturbances. Indeed biological rhythms can even be potentially targeted in insects of medical and agricultural importance such as flies that spoil our fruit - a big problem all over the world.
The study from Leicester and Padova is published in the Advance Online Publication on www.nature.com. Funding for the research came predominantly from a number of sources, the European Community, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences and Natural Environment Research Councils, the Royal Society, the Medical Research Council, the Italian Space Agency and the Ministero dell'Università e delle Ricerca
Bambos Kyriacou, Professor of Behavioural Genetics at the University of Leicester, who led the study in the UK, turned his own garden into a ‘lab’ for the study- using his children’s playhouse as the experimental centre.
He said: “The fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster is the ‘workhorse’ for genetic research into higher organisms. It has been the major model system for understanding how the 24 hour clock works, and how genes that control these ‘biorhythms’, build the ‘bodyclock’. Luckily, it turns out that the clock mechanism is conserved from flies to mammals so studying these genes in the fly does the same job for the human.
“Much of the work done over the past 40 years on fly rhythms uses the flies sleep-wake cycle as a read-out for the clock, and how the fly wakes up in the morning, has a mid-day siesta, and is active again in the evenings, before falling asleep at night, has been dissected in exquisite detail both genetically and neurobiologically.
“So, for example, we know which clock neurons control the fly’s wake-up call in the morning and which ones determine its evening behavioural activity. However, all this work has been done in the laboratory, under very artificial conditions where the temperature is constant, and the light comes on suddenly in the morning and goes off suddenly at night.
“This study, published in Nature did something different. By monitoring the behavioural rhythms of the flies and the temperature, sunlight, moonlight, humidity etc in a warm (Italian) and cold and wet (Leicester) environment, we were able to see exactly how flies react to changing light levels at dawn and dusk and to cycling temperatures during the day.
“The results were very surprising – flies simply did not do what they should. Instead of a siesta in the middle of the day, they became most active at that time. Instead of arrhythmic clock mutants showing defective rhythms, they showed perfectly good behavioural cycles, and instead of flies anticipating dawn as they do in the lab, they simply reacted to the changing light levels during the twilights.
In other words, some of the ideas we had about how rhythmic behaviour in the lab might correspond to that in the wild, turned out to be wrong.
“The clock genes identified over the past four decades have defined the field of chronobiology- however it may be that the importance of these genes for survival has been overstated. This study suggests that behaviour, which is the brain’s way of changing its environment (ie if it’s too cold, go somewhere where it’s hot) does not need to anticipate changes in the environment - it can simply react to them.
“However, underlying physiology probably does need to anticipate regular changes. For example, peripheral tissues (liver, kidneys etc) might need to anticipate regular environmental changes because they cannot react as quickly as the brain.
“This work also suggests that studying organisms in more natural environments is important because it can be applied to animal welfare. For example, providing more natural environments for animals that are farmed indoors, may enhance their health and well-being. “
The work in the UK and Italy was done predominantly by Supriya Bhutani, who was a PhD student in the fly lab in the Genetics Department at the University of Leicester, and Stefano Vanin, an Italian postdoc in the laboratory of Prof Kyriacou’s long term associate, Prof Rudi Costa from the Biology Department at the University of Padova - where Galileo did his experiments – Stefano did the same natural experiments in his garden in the nearby town of Treviso.
You can watch Professor Kyriacou talking about the use of fruitflies in research here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IItxLliRy-c
Note to editors:
Charalambos (Bambos) Kyriacou, FMedSci
Professor of Behavioural Genetics
Department of Genetics,
University of Leicester
Professors Kyriacou and Costa are available via mobile phone for interview. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org or ring 0116 252 2415 for their numbers.
The paper: Unexpected features of Drosophila circadian behavioural rhythms under natural conditions” has been scheduled for Advance Online Publication (AOP) on www.nature.com at 1800 London time / 1300 US Eastern Time on 04 April 2012.
The full listing of authors and their affiliations for this paper is as follows:
Stefano Vanin*1†, Supriya Bhutani2*$, Stefano Montelli1^, Pamela Menegazzi1%, Edward W. Green2, Mirko Pegoraro1,2, Federica Sandrelli1, Rodolfo Costa1 & Charalambos P. Kyriacou2
1Department of Biology, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy
2Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
†Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences,School of Applied Science, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK (S.V.)
$ Department of Cellular and Molecular Neurosciences, National Brain Research Centre, Manesar NH8,Haryana, 122050, India (S.B.)
^Department of Experimental Veterinary Science, University of Padova, Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro (Agripolis) Padova, Italy (S.M.)
%Lehrstuhl für Neurobiologie undGenetik, Universität Würzburg, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany (P.M.)
The following funding acknowledgements from the authors appear at the end of the paper:
This work was funded by grants from the European Community (the 6th Framework Project EUCLOCK no. 018741) to RC and CPK, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and Natural Environment Research Council to CPK, the Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award to CPK, a Medical Research Council studentship to EWG. RC also thanks the Italian Space Agency (DCMC grant) and the Ministero dell'Università e delle Ricerca (MIUR).