Shaun M. Cowley

cowley_re.jpg

Tel: +44 (0)116 229 7098

Email: smc57@le.ac.uk

Personal details

  • 1994-1998: PhD Student - Imperial Cancer Research Fund, London, UK
  • 1999-2004: Postdoctoral Fellow - Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
  • 2004-2006: Senior Research Associate - Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
  • Appointed to Lectureship in Gene Expression, University of Leicester 2007

Publications

  1. Jamaladdin S, Kelly RD, O'Regan L, Dovey OM, Hodson GE, Millard CJ, Portolano N, Fry AM, Schwabe JW, Cowley SM.  Histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 and 2 are essential for accurate cell division and the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 23
  2. Kelly RDW and Cowley SM. The physiological roles of histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 and 2: complex co-stars with multiple leading parts. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013 Jun 1;41(3):741-9
  3. Dovey OM, Foster CT, Conte N, Edwards SA, Edwards JM, Singh R, Vassiliou G, Bradley A, Cowley SM. Histone deacetylase 1 and 2 are essential for normal T-cell development and genomic stability in mice.  Blood.  2013 vol. 121 no. 8 1335-1344
  4. Whyte WA, Bilodeau S, Orlando DA, Hoke HA, Frampton GM, Foster CT, Cowley SM and Young RA. Enhancer decommissioning by LSD1 during embryonic stem cell differentiation.  Nature. 2012. FEB 9; 482: 221-225
  5. Foster CT, Dovey OM, Lezina L, Luo JL, Gant TW, Barlev N, Bradley A and Cowley SM. Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) Regulates the Embryonic Transcriptome and CoREST Stability.  Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010;30 4851-4863
  6. Dovey OM, Foster CT and Cowley SM. Emphasising the positive: A role for histone deacetylases in transcriptional activation.  Cell Cycle. 2010 July 15;9(14):2700-2701.
  7. Dovey OM, Foster CT and Cowley SM. Histone Deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), but not HDAC2, controls embryonic stem cell differentiation.  PNAS. 2010 May 4;107(18):8242-8247.
  8. Cowley SM, Iritani BM, Mendrysa SM, Xu T, Cheng PF, Yada JJ, Liggit DH, Eisenman RN. The mSin3A chromatin-modifying complex is essential for embryogenesis and T-cell development. Mol Cell Biol. 2005 Aug;25(16):6990-7004.
  9. Swanson KA, Knoepfler PS, Huang K, Kang RS, Cowley SM, Laherty CD, Eisenman RN, Radhakrishnan I. HBP1 and Mad1 repressors bind the Sin3 corepressor PAH2 domain with opposite helical orientations. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 Aug;11(8):738-46.
  10. Cowley SM, Kang RS, Frangioni JV, Yada JJ, DeGrand AM, Radhakrishnan I, Eisenman RN. Functional analysis of the Mad1-mSin3A repressor-corepressor interaction reveals determinants of specificity, affinity, and transcriptional response. Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Apr;24(7):2698-709
  11. Orian A, van Steensel B, Delrow J, Bussemaker HJ, Li L, Sawado T, Williams E, Loo LW, Cowley SM, Yost C, Pierce S, Edgar BA, Parkhurst SM, Eisenman RN. Genomic binding by the Drosophila Myc, Max, Mad/Mnt transcription factor network. Genes Dev. 2003 May 1;17(9):1101-14.
  12. Hook SS, Orian A, Cowley SM, Eisenman RN. Histone deacetylase 6 binds polyubiquitin through its zinc finger (PAZ domain) and copurifies with deubiquitinating enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 15;99(21):13425-30.
  13. Brubaker K, Cowley SM, Huang K, Loo L, Yochum GS, Ayer DE, Eisenman RN, Radhakrishnan I. Solution structure of the interacting domains of the Mad-Sin3 complex: implications for recruitment of a chromatin-modifying complex. Cell. 2000 Nov 10;103(4):655-65.
  14. Grandori C, Cowley SM, James LP, Eisenman RN. The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behaviour. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000;16:653-99.
  15. Cowley SM, Parker MG. A comparison of transcriptional activation by ER alpha and ER beta. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1999 Apr-Jun;69(1-6):165-75
  16. Parker MG, Cowley SM, Heery D, Henttu P, Kalkhoven E, Sjoberg M, Valentine JE, White R. Function of Estrogen Receptors in Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer. 1997 Dec 25;4(4):204-208.
  17. Cowley SM, Hoare S, Mosselman S, Parker MG. Oestrogen receptors alpha and beta form heterodimers on DNA. J Biol Chem. 1997 Aug 8;272(32):19858-62.

Research

The control of gene expression by histone-modifying enzymes

Introduction

The ability to regulate the transcription of protein-coding genes in response to growth factors, cellular stress, DNA damage or normal development is one of the most fundamental processes of life. Our laboratory utilises transgenic mice, ES cell culture and biochemical approaches to address the function of ‘histone modifying’ enzymes and their associated complexes, in an effort to understand the molecular mechanisms by which they control gene expression in vivo.

Our primary interest is the function of a class of histone modifying enzymes called, histone deacetylases (HDACs). HDACs, as their name implies, remove the acetyl group from lysine residues present within histone tails. HDACs are utilised by a variety of transcriptional repressors, in many cell types, to inhibit transcription at a gene-specific level (for a detailed discussion of HDAC enzymes, see below).

In addition to acetylation, we are also studying the effects of histone methylation on the levels of gene activity in vivo. LSD1 (lysine-specific demethylase 1) was the first protein demethylase to be isolated and characterised. We are currently analysing the phenotypic consequences of loss of LSD-1 activity, using LSD1 knock-out mice generated in the lab (see below).

 

sm57_r_clip_image002_image1.jpg

 

The transcription of protein coding genes is controlled on various levels. The DNA primary sequence defines the protein coding elements of the genome and contains conserved non-coding elements which are the binding sites for transcription factors.

DNA modification: Approximately 3-4% of cytosines are methylated in normal human cells. This generally occurs at the dinucleotide CpG. Concentrated levels of DNA methylation (hypermethylation) around genes often results in transcriptional silencing.

Chromatin: The DNA in each cell is not naked but is entwined with a restrictive coat of histone and non-histone proteins which is collectively termed chromatin. The transcriptional potential of a gene is directly related to its chromatin context, which in turn, is influenced by the covalent modification of its core histone components. Histones form a physical impediment to the cellular machinery which needs access to the DNA in order to transcribe protein coding genes. Post-translational modification of histones is, therefore, an important method for regulating access to DNA.

Transcription and Histone Acetylation

Acetylation of lysine residues within the N-termini of histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 correlates with regions of transcriptional activity. Conversely, histones within heterochromatin, regions which contain few active genes, are generally hypoacetylated. This simple dichotomy is best observed in the process of X chromosome inactivation where the inactivated X is almost absent of acetylated histone H3 and H4, while histones incorporated into the active X are abundantly acetylated [1]. Histone acetylation is a reversible process. Removal of the acetyl moiety from lysine residues in histone tails is catalysed by a family of enzymes termed ‘histone deacetylases’ (HDACs). Loss of the acetyl group restores the lysine’s positive charge, thus increasing the natural affinity of the histone tail for the phosphate backbone of DNA, creating a repressive chromatin conformation. Transcription factors are able to manipulate this transient modification of chromatin to positively or negatively regulate transcription at a gene-specific level. There are 18 HDAC enzymes in mammalian cells which can be broadly classified into three groups: Class-I HDACs (1, 2, 3 and 8) which are widely expressed, Class-II HDACs (4, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10) that share a similar catalytic domain to class-I enzymes but have larger N-termini and are more restricted in their expression patterns, and the Sirtuin family of NAD dependent HDACs (Class-III).

sm57_r_clip_image004_image2.jpg


Class-I HDACs: repression, proliferation and cancer

Mammalian Class-I HDACs (1, 2, 3 and 8) are abundant, ubiquitously expressed and share a high degree of sequence similarity. They are located almost exclusively in the nucleus as part of multi-protein complexes which regulate gene expression by modulating chromatin structure (see figure of known complexes, below).

sm57_r_clip_image006_image3.jpg

One of the best-characterised examples of a class-I HDAC containing complex is the mSin3A complex, which contains mSin3A, HDAC1 or 2, Sap18, Sap30, SDS3 and RbAP48 [2]. Often the interaction between HDACs and transcriptional repressors is indirect, mediated through co-repressor proteins, such as mSin3A. Over 40 different DNA-bound repressors (including tumour suppressors p53 and Rb) function by interacting with mSin3A 3, thereby increasing the local concentration of HDAC1 (or 2), which deacetylate histones, resulting in a more repressive form of chromatin. One such repressor is the methylated CpG binding protein, MecP2. Mutations in Mecp2 cause Rett Syndrome a neurodegenerative disease that affects predominantly young girls [4]. The mSin3A/HDAC complex is thus an excellent paradigm for the study of HDAC containing complexes.

 

sm57_r_clip_image008_image4.jpg

Collectively, these HDAC containing complexes through a variety of protein-protein interactions, that have yet to be fully characterised, have been implicated in many processes including, cell cycle progression [5], DNA repair [6], differentiation [7,8], genomic stability [9] and cancer [10].

Clinically class-I HDAC enzymes are of great interest because they are ‘druggable’. Inhibition of HDAC activity in cancer cell lines, using small molecule inhibitors, results in cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Currently, HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) are being tested in clinical trials as anti-cancer agents [11]. In addition, HDACi’s have also been found to ameliorate the neurodegenerative and motor deficits in animal models of Huntingdon’s disease [12,13]. A broad spectrum of possibilities exists for the clinical application of HDACi’s. The search is now on to develop specific HDACi’s that will inactivate individual HDAC enzymes. There is, therefore, a compelling applied, as well as academic, motivation for the study of Class-I HDACs enzymes.

Using specific HDAC knock-out mice and embryonic stem (ES) cells generated in the lab, we are beginning to address the roles of HDACs 1, 2 and 8 in cell cycle progression, embryonic development, thymocyte development and cancer. By building a comprehensive list of repressors which recruit HDACs in vivo and the genes to which they are directly targeted, we hope to understand the molecular mechanism(s) by which they perform these tasks.

Function of the Lysine Specific Demethylase, LSD-1 in vivo

The lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD-1) was the first protein demethylase to be isolated and characterised [14]. LSD-1 functions by removing the methyl moieties from di-methylated lys4 on histone H3, a marker that correlates with regions of active transcription. Consistent with removing this positive marker of transcription from chromatin, LSD-1 is a constituent of a co-repressor complex which contains CoREST and HDAC1 proteins [15].

 

sm57_r_clip_image010_image5.jpg

We are currently using the LSD1-KO mice generated in our lab to analyse the role of histone methylation in vivo.

References

[1] Chang, S et al. Frontiers in Bioscience 11, 852-866, 2006

[2] Laherty CD, et al. Cell. 1997 May 2;89(3):349-5

[3] Silverstein et al, Curr Genet. (2005) 47: 1–17

[4] Amir et al, Nat Genet. 1999 Oct;23(2):185-8

[5] Lagger et al, EMBO J. 2002 Jun 3;21(11):2672-81

[6] Scott and Plon, Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Jul;23(13):4522-31

[7] Yamaguchi et al, Development. 2005 Jul;132(13):3027-43

[8] Cunliffe and Casaccia-Bonnefil Mech Dev. 2005 Nov 29

[9] Pothof et al, Genes Dev. 2003 Feb 15;17(4):443-8.

[10] Lin et al, Nature. 1998 Feb 19;391(6669):811-4

[11] Dokmanovic M, Marks PA J Cell Biochem. 2005 Oct 1;96(2):293-304

[12] Hockly et al, PNAS. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):2041-6. 2003 Feb 7

[13] Ferrante et al, J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 15;23(28):9418-27

[14] Shi Y et al, Cell 2004 Dec 29;119(7):941-53.

[15] Hakimi et al, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7420-5

Share this page:

Contact Details

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
Henry Wellcome Building
Lancaster Road
Leicester
LE1 7RH (Postal)

LE1 7HB (Sat Nav/Online maps)

T:  +44(0)116 229 7038
F:  +44(0)116 229 7123
MolCellBiol@le.ac.uk

Accessibility

DisabledGo logo

The University of Leicester is committed to equal access to our facilities. DisabledGo has a detailed accessibility guide for the Henry Wellcome Building.

Redfearn Lecture 2017

To Be Confirmed