Emma Angell
Research Associate

CONTACT DETAILS
RESEARCH INTERESTS
TEACHING
TRAINING
RESEARCH PROJECTS
-
Responsiveness of primary care services: development of a patient-report measure. 2010-2013. Tarrant C, Freeman G, Boulton M, Box G . Service Delivery and Organisation. Click HERE for more details.
- Further analysis of cancer trial research ethics committee applications: improving quality in patient information sheets. 2009-2010. Dixon-Woods M, Tarrant C, Angell E. National Research Ethics Service
- Medical homes for patients. 2009-2010. Grol R, Voerman G, Faber M, Burgers J, Wensing M. Commonwealth Fund
- Analysis of Research Ethics Committees' letters about studies before and after the Mental Capacity Act. 2008. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Robertson, N, Angell E. National Research Ethics Service
- Analysis of Research Ethics Committees' letters about cancer trials and human tissue. 2007-2008. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Bryman A, Angell E. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees
- Review of regulation of medical research. 2006-2007. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Brownsword R, Bryman A, Yeung K. Medical Research Council
- Qualitative analysis of Research Ethics Committees' letters and accreditation reports. 2006. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Angell E. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees
- Consistency of Research Ethics Committee decision-making. 2006 Dixon-Woods M. East Midlands Innovation Hub
CONSULTANCIES
- Quality improvement for Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and applicants. 2010. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E. National Research Ethics Service
-
Adults lacking capacity to consent to research: A toolkit for RECs and researchers. 2010. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E, Willmott C, Newson A. National Research Ethics Service
-
Training modules for REC members, REC administrators, REC chairs and applicants. 2009. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E. National Research Ethics Service
PUBLICATIONS
- Angell EL, Biggs H, Gahleitner F, Dixon-Woods M (2010). What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 95:915-917
- Angell EL, Tarrant C, Dixon-Woods M (2009). Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by Research Ethics Committees? Journal of Clinical Pathology, 62;825-829
- Dixon-Woods M, Angell EL (2009). Research involving adults who lack capacity: How have Research Ethics Committees interpreted the requirements? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35:377-381
- O’Reilly M, Dixon-Woods M, Angell EL, Ashcroft R, Bryman A (2009). Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters. Sociology of Health and Illness, 31:246-261
- Angell EL, Dixon-Woods M (2009). Do Research Ethics Committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35:130-132
- Angell EL, Dixon-Woods M (2008). Style matters: an analysis of 100 research ethics committee decision letters. Research Ethics Review, 4:101-103
- Dixon-Woods M, Angell EL, Tarrant C, Thomas A (2008). What do research ethics committees say about applications to do cancer trials? Lancet Oncology, 9:700-701
- Angell E, Bryman A, Ashcroft R, Dixon-Woods M (2008). An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the science/ethics quality boundary examined. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 17:131-136
- Dixon-Woods M, Angell E, Ashcroft RE, Bryman A (2007). Written work: The social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters. Social Science & Medicine 65:792-802
- Angell EL, Jackson CJ, Ashcroft RE, Bryman A, Windridge K, Dixon-Woods M (2007). Is ‘inconsistency’ in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection. Clinical Ethics, 2:92-99
- Angell E, Sutton A, Windridge K, Dixon-Woods M (2006). Consistency in Research Ethics Committee decision-making: a controlled comparison. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(11):662-664