Emma Angell

Research Associate

 

Emma Angell

 

CONTACT DETAILS

Department of Health Sciences
University of Leicester
22-28 Princess Road West
Leicester, LE1 6TP

Tel: +44 (0)116 229 7256
Email: elj1@le.ac.uk 

 

RESEARCH INTERESTS

My research interests include:

  • Responsiveness in primary care
  • Research ethics committees & research governance
  • Regulation in biomedical research

 

TEACHING

I teach small groups in the Health & Disease in Society (HaDSoc) and Health Pyshology & Human Diversity (HealthPsych) modules for medical students.

 

TRAINING

I provide training in qualitative analysis software, QSR NVivo10, on behalf of IT Services and the Academic Practice Unit.  I provide Guided Learning Sessions for individuals and small groups and lead the introductory course for delegates with little or no previous knowledge of NVivo7.

 

RESEARCH PROJECTS
  • Responsiveness of primary care services: development of a patient-report measure.  2010-2013.  Tarrant C, Freeman G, Boulton M, Box G . Service Delivery and Organisation. Click HERE for more details.

  • Further analysis of cancer trial research ethics committee applications: improving quality in patient information sheets.  2009-2010. Dixon-Woods M, Tarrant C, Angell E. National Research Ethics Service
  • Medical homes for patients.  2009-2010.  Grol R, Voerman G, Faber M, Burgers J, Wensing M.  Commonwealth Fund
  • Analysis of Research Ethics Committees' letters about studies before and after the Mental Capacity Act.  2008. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Robertson, N, Angell E. National Research Ethics Service
  • Analysis of Research Ethics Committees' letters about cancer trials and human tissue.  2007-2008. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Bryman A, Angell E. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees
  • Review of regulation of medical research. 2006-2007. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Brownsword R, Bryman A, Yeung K. Medical Research Council
  • Qualitative analysis of Research Ethics Committees' letters and accreditation reports. 2006. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft R, Angell E. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees
  • Consistency of Research Ethics Committee decision-making. 2006 Dixon-Woods M. East Midlands Innovation Hub

 

CONSULTANCIES
  • Quality improvement for Research Ethics Committees (RECs) and applicants. 2010. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E.  National Research Ethics Service
  • Adults lacking capacity to consent to research: A toolkit for RECs and researchers. 2010. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E, Willmott C, Newson A.  National Research Ethics Service

  • Training modules for REC members, REC administrators, REC chairs and applicants. 2009. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E.  National Research Ethics Service

 

PUBLICATIONS
  1. Angell EL, Biggs H, Gahleitner F, Dixon-Woods M (2010). What do research ethics committees say about applications to conduct research involving children? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 95:915-917
  2. Angell EL, Tarrant C, Dixon-Woods M (2009). Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by Research Ethics Committees? Journal of Clinical Pathology, 62;825-829
  3. Dixon-Woods M, Angell EL (2009).  Research involving adults who lack capacity: How have Research Ethics Committees interpreted the requirements? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35:377-381
  4. O’Reilly M, Dixon-Woods M, Angell EL, Ashcroft R, Bryman A (2009).  Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of research ethics committee letters.  Sociology of Health and Illness, 31:246-261
  5. Angell EL, Dixon-Woods M (2009).  Do Research Ethics Committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35:130-132
  6. Angell EL, Dixon-Woods M (2008). Style matters: an analysis of 100 research ethics committee decision letters.  Research Ethics Review, 4:101-103
  7. Dixon-Woods M, Angell EL, Tarrant C, Thomas A (2008).  What do research ethics committees say about applications to do cancer trials? Lancet Oncology, 9:700-701
  8. Angell E, Bryman A, Ashcroft R, Dixon-Woods M (2008). An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the science/ethics quality boundary examined.  Quality & Safety in Health Care, 17:131-136
  9. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E, Ashcroft RE, Bryman A (2007). Written work: The social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters. Social Science & Medicine 65:792-802
  10. Angell EL, Jackson CJ, Ashcroft RE, Bryman A, Windridge K, Dixon-Woods M (2007). Is ‘inconsistency’ in research ethics committee decision-making really a problem? An empirical investigation and reflection. Clinical Ethics, 2:92-99
  11. Angell E, Sutton A, Windridge K, Dixon-Woods M (2006). Consistency in Research Ethics Committee decision-making: a controlled comparison.  Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(11):662-664

Share this page: