Personal tools

2009 Publications

A selection of publications:
  1. Martin GP, Currie G, Finn R. Bringing genetics into primary care: findings from a national evaluation of pilots in England. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 14(4): 204-211
  2. Martin GP, Currie G and Finn R. Leadership, service reform, and public-service networks: the case of cancer-genetics pilots in the English NHS. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 19(4): 769-794
  3. Currie G, Martin G, Finn R. Professional competition and modernising the clinical workforce in the NHS: possibilities and limits to the development of the specialist generalist in primary care. Work, Employment & Society 23(2): 267-284.
  4. Martin GP, Currie G, Finn R. Reconfiguring or reproducing intra-professional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledge and the ‘modernization’ of the medical workforce. Social Science & Medicine 68(7): 1191-1198.
  5. Martin GP. Whose health, whose care, whose say? Some comments on public involvement in new NHS commissioning arrangements. Critical Public Health 19(1): 123-132
  6. Martin GP. Public and user participation in public-service delivery: tensions in policy and practice. Sociology Compass 3(2): 310-326
  7. Learmonth M, Martin G, Warwick P. Ordinary and effective: the Catch 22 in managing the public voice in health care? Health Expectations 12(1): 106-115
  8. O’Reilly M, Armstrong N, Dixon-Woods M. Subject positions in Research Ethics Committee letters: a discursive analysis. Clinical Ethics Vol.4 No.4 pp.187-194
  9. Jennings A, Powell J, Armstrong N, Sturt J, Dale J. A virtual community for diabetes self-management: pilot study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 11(1):e10
  10. Armstrong N, and Powell J. Patient perspectives on health advice posted on internet discussion boards: a qualitative study. Health Expectations Vol.12 No.3 pp. 313-320
  11. Powell J, Jennings A, Armstrong N, Sturt J, Dale J. Pilot study of a virtual diabetes clinic: satisfaction and usability. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Vol.15 No.3 pp. 150 – 152
  12. Jackson CJ, Dixon-Woods M, Tobin M, Young B, Heney D, Pritchard-Jones K. Seeking consent to tissue banking: a survey of health professionals in childhood cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care 18; 391-400
  13. Angell E, Tarrant C, Dixon-Woods M.  Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by Research Ethics Committees? Journal of Clinical Pathology 62: 825-9
  14. Dixon-Woods M, Suokas A, Pitchforth E, Tarrant C. An ethnographic study of classifying and accounting for risk at the sharp end of medical wards. Social Science and Medicine  69: 362-269
  15. Dixon-Woods M, Tarrant C. Why do people cooperate with medical research? Social Science and Medicine 68: 2215-2222
  16. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E. Research involving adults who lack capacity: how have research ethics committees interpreted the requirements? Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 377-381
  17. O'Reilly M, Dixon-Woods M, Angell E, Ashcroft RE, Bryman A. Doing accountability: a discourse analysis of Research Ethics Committee letters. Sociology of Health and Illness 31: 246-261
  18. Angell E, Dixon-Woods M.  Do Research Ethics Committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 130-132
  19. Ashcroft RE, Dixon-Woods M. The social forms and functions of bioethics in the United Kingdom. In Myser C (ed) Bioethics Around the Globe. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  20. Tarrant C, Baker R, Colman AM, Sinfield P, Agarwal S, Mellon JK, Steward W, Kockelbergh R. The Prostate Care Questionnaire for Patients (PCQ–P):  Reliability, validity and acceptability. BMC Health Services Research, 9:199.
  21. Sinfield P, Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Colman AM, Tarrant C, Mellon JK, Steward W, Kockelbergh R, Agarwal S. Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review.  Health Expectations, 12(3):301-312.
  22. Paddison CAM, Eborall H, Sutton S, French DP, Vasconcelos J, Prevost AT, Kinmonth A-L, Griffin SJ. Are people with negative screening tests for diabetes falsely reassured?  A parallel group cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial.  BMJ 339: 4535.
  23. French D, Eborall H, Griffin S, Kinmonth AL, Prevost AT, Sutton S. Health questionnaires are not reactive: evidence from a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62:74-80.
  24. Baum M, McCartney M, Thornton H. et al. Breast cancer screening peril. Negative consequences of the breast screening programme .  http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/letters/article5761650.ece?print=yes&randnum
  25. Thornton H. The `truth` about mammography screening? Nearing the end of a long and arduous Damascus Road. International Journal of Surgery. 7:177-179
  26. Thornton H. Statistical illiteracy is damaging our health. Doctors and patients need to understand numbers if meaningful dialogues are to occur. International Journal of Surgery. 7:279-284
  27. Evans I, Thornton H. Transparency in numbers. The dangers of statistical illiteracy. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 102(9):354-356; doi101258/jrsm.2009.090214.
  28. Thornton H. What research means to patients, and the importance of partnership with practitioners in research. Journal of Radiotherapy Practice. Special Issue. 8:02:79-85
  29. Thornton H. Comment on editorial: The UK Biobank Project: trust and altruism are alive and well. A model for achieving public support for research using personal data.  International Journal of Surgery, 7 501-502;

Share this page: