Personal tools

2008 Publications

A selection of publications:
  1. Martin GP. Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-care management. Social Science & Medicine 67(11): 1757-1765
  2. Glasby J, Martin G and Regen E. Older people and the relationship between hospital services and intermediate care: results from a national evaluation. Journal of Interprofessional Care 23(6): 639-649
  3. Regen E, Martin G, Glasby J, Hewitt G, Nancarrow S and Parker H. Challenges, benefits and weaknesses of intermediate care: results from five UK case study sites. Health and Social Care in the Community 16(6): 629-637
  4. Kaambwa B, Bryan S, Barton P, Parker H, Martin G, Hewitt G, Parker S and Wilson A. Costs and health outcomes of intermediate care: results from five UK case study sites. Health & Social Care in the Community 16(6): 573-581
  5. Currie G, Finn R, Martin G. Accounting for the ‘dark side’ of new organizational forms: the case of healthcare professionals. Human Relations 61(4): 539-564
  6. Martin GP. “Ordinary people only”: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness 30(1): 35-54
  7. Minion JT, Bath PA, and Albright K.  The information world of gay men living with HIV.  Information Research [Online]. 13(4).
  8. Armstrong N and Murphy E. Weaving meaning? An exploration of the interplay between lay and professional understandings of cervical cancer risk. Social Science and Medicine Vol.67 No.7 pp. 1074-1082
  9. Armstrong N and Powell J. Preliminary test of an Internet-based diabetes self-management tool. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Vol.14 No.3 pp.114-116
  10. Tinker C and Armstrong N.  From the outside looking in: how an awareness of difference can benefit the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report Vol.13 No.1 pp.53-60
  11. Powell J and Armstrong N. ‘Involving patients and the public in e-health research’ In V. Wilson (ed.) Patient-Centered E-Health. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing
  12. Gillespie A, Cornish F, Aveling EL & Zittoun T.  Conflicting community commitments: A dialogical analysis of a British woman’s World War II diaries.  Journal of Community Psychology, 36 (1), pp35-52
  13. Zittoun T, Cornish F, Gillespie A & Aveling EL.  Using social knowledge: A case study of a diarist’s meaning-making during World War II. In T. Sugiman, K. Gergen & W. Wagner (Eds.) Meaning in action: Construction, narrative and representation. New York: Springer Verlag
  14. Angell E, Dixon-Woods M. Style matters: an analysis of 100 Research Ethics Committee letters. Research Ethics Review  4: 101-105
  15. Dixon-Woods M, Angell E, Tarrant C, Thomas A. What do Research Ethics Committees say about applications to do cancer trials? The Lancet Oncology 9: 700-1
  16. Brown L, Parker M, Dixon-Woods M. Whose interest? UK newspaper reporting of use of medical records for research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 13: 140-145
  17. Dixon-Woods, Cavers D, Jackson CJ, Young B, Forster J, Heney D, Pritchard-Jones K. Tissue samples as "gifts" for research: a qualitative study of families and professionals.  Medical Law International 9: 131-150
  18. Dixon-Woods M, Wilson D, Jackson C, Cavers D, Pritchard-Jones K. Human tissue and “the public”: the case of childhood cancer tumour banking. Biosocieties 3: 57-80
  19. Dixon-Woods M, Ashcroft RE. Regulation and the social licence for medical research. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy 11: 381-391 10.1007/s11019-008-9152-0
  20. Ockleford E, Shaw RL, Willars J, Dixon-Woods M. Education and self-management for people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients' views. Chronic Illness 4: 28-37
  21. Pritchard-Jones K, Dixon-Woods M, Naafs-Wilstra MA, Valscecchi MG. Improving recruitment to clinical trials in childhood cancer. The Lancet Oncology 9: 392-9
  22. Angell E, Bryman A, Ashcroft R, Dixon-Woods M. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.  Quality and Safety in Healthcare 17: 131-136
  23. Sinfield P, Baker R, Agarwal S, Tarrant C. Patient-centred care: what are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners? Patient Education and Counseling, 73(1), 91-96
  24. Tarrant C, Colman AM, Stokes T. Past experience, ‘shadow of the future', and patient trust: A cross-sectional survey.  British Journal of General Practice, 58, 780-783
  25. Tarrant C, Sinfield P, Agarwal S, Baker R. Is seeing a specialist nurse associated with positive experiences of care? The role and value of specialist nurses in prostate cancer care. BMC Health Services Research, 8:65.
  26. Thornton, H. Clinical trials - a brave new partnership: a new doctor-patient working relationship in research. International Journal of Surgery 6(4):289-292.
  27. Thornton, H. Patient and public involvement in clinical trials - Is established worldwide, but encouragement is needed to promote institutional collaboration and to avoid duplication of effort. BMJ 336(7650):903-904
  28. Edwards, A. Gray, J. Clarke, A. Dundon, J. Elwyn, G. Gaff, C. Hood, K. Iredale, R. Sivell, S. Shaw, C. and Thornton, H. Interventions to improve risk communications in clinical genetics: Systematic review.  Patient Education and Counseling 71(1):4-25
  29. Sivell S, Elwyn G, Gaff C, Clarke A, Iredale R, Shaw C, Dundon J, Thornton H, Edwards A. How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review. Journal of Genetic Counselling 17(1): 31-63
  30. Thornton, H. An end user perspective of screening mammography. Mammology 3(1):12-19

 

 

Share this page: